heyrabbit

I sometimes wonder if they realize they suck, or if they actually think they're good. olp were good until turner left. everyone's bashing them now but I know you know you all loved them. Raine's voice was cool, or rather, it was. I appreciated his singing because it's rare to have such a distinct, eccentric singing style and still be popular.(you could argue he sounds like corgan, but whatever) ah I've already made long posts explaining why gravity sucks, I'm not doing it again! maybe ill search for one of the million OLP threads that've been made before. as for the whole matt/olp thing, that's ancient man

nooodles ;) :angry: :angry:

Without You was the first song written that's on diorama. it was written around the neon ballroom era, that's why it's so different from the rest of the album, and I think it's also the reason why it seems to be everyones favorite song from diorama. it's an amazing song

NO it wouldn't be a bad thing. it would make the league 5 times better (literally) in concentration of talent. not all of the american teams are having major troubles. there are a number of successful organizations (detroit,dallas,new jersey,new york,colorado) etc. I find the new NHL less entertaining, personally, i haven't watched hardly any games this year

I have a problem. im pretty new to downloading movies, and sometimes when i download them the sound works and sometimes it doesn't, suggestions? sometimes the sound works for avi's , sometimes not. I don't get it. suggestions?!

I don't think they're capable of making a bad album. they're just pure talent and they've been my fav ever since frogstomp. my only criticism would be that sometime around the diorama era daniel started to drastically change his singing style, and ever since then he's had trouble singing his new songs aswell as the older stuff because he keeps trying to get more technical. It's good to put a new twist on old songs, and it's good to be ambitious about your singing, but he's become so eccentric that he's simply not hitting the right notes and it sounds bad live. sometimes it sounds as though he's just inventing a new way of singing the song on the spot because he's bored. hopefully this is just a phase he'll pass through one of the things that made their first albums so great is is that they could play every song perfectly live.

11 he looks like he regrets killing ;)

:angry: OOOOO the ghost of my previous number ;) :angry: :angry:

i get along with me, we like all the exact same foods, creative interests, views, everything. we have a special bond that nobody can ever take away. and we can sit and talk for hours ;) :angry:

steal chrismas-light bulbs and smash them on the street. it's good for a giggle, though you're not twelve y/o, and it's not chrismas so they could be hard to find... that's the only thing i've ever done in london, oh and impress your friends by setting off cherry bombs in public garbage cans. steal tobacco? ;)

stickam.com man, you shouldn't need more than that.

PB & MOTHER-FUCKING-J SANDWICH! ;)

is this that show with red-headed guy with the boston accent? If so, it's the worst sitcom i can remember in recent memory. terrible, terrible, shitty writing. the fake applause should tell you something... fake applause hasn't really been used since the early 90s.

it's my party - lesley gore

it's war on da streets and shiri in da middle east ;)

hell no it's not an insult. i get a boner every time I read this thread

Couldn't of said it better myself. sorrryy, my bad. those terms are very interchangable, so much os that I didn't even think about it. geeks get called nerds and nerds get called geeks. I guess it's my fault that you're nitpicking though cause I put up the definitions I should have asked "who gets called a nerd" instead

I wasn't expressing my disdain towards those who those who deny RATM's greatness by being facetiously sarcastic ;)

I think the events surrounding the conception are in Luke somewhere. Mary was 13 when god asked her through an angel if she would conceive jesus -- literally a school child at the time. Many will argue that that was the norm at the time, which is true, although so was homophobia and a belief that the sun revolved around the earth. Nowadays if you inseminate a thirteen year-old, or even a sixteen year-old, and your only excuse is that "she consented", you're considered a pedophile and sent to jail. It's understandable that the people of the time would be ignorant about emotional development but god had no excuse. Every time you discredit portions of the bible as being untrue you inevitably invalidate other parts of the bible and you lessen its validity as a whole. Logic is literally non-contradictory identification which includes identification of contradictions. So I don't know if you admit that the bible is illogical or not? Certain parts of the bible don't make sense without other parts so it's impossible to cherry-pick the bible without acknowledging contradictions and while remaining consistent in your belief. It doesn't make sense to say that you unequivocally believe in christ, although the main source of information on him is completely illogical. I'm an agnostic in the sense that I can't definitively disprove something that's inherently non-disprovable. You'll find that many or possibly even most christians, when asked deeply, some of their main justifications for their belief is just the fact that it can't be disproved. "Who's to know?" etc. The big bang and evolution directly contradict christian philosophy. When someone believes in something they unconsciously and continuously search for validation for that belief. Christians will see a beautiful sunset, or a baby, or a "miracle" and they will view this as conformation that their belief is true. But the point is that muslims view these same things as conformation that their beliefs are true. So, these things are no more of an indication of jesus' existence than they are for allah, or Shiva or whoever else. Not many people realize that their beliefs sometimes have everything to do with wherever they happened to have been born. And the point I've tried to make is that religion does harm people. Also, you shouldn't have to "take things" from any religion. That's what I mean about cherry-picking. The main positive thing that people take from religion is the golden rule but that exists independently of religion. Why not skip the bible and go straight for the golden rule? You don't need to accept the bible as being true in order to get something out of reading it. It's easier to not be labeled because, when your beliefs aren't clearly defined, normally you're not expected to adduce reasons for them. If someone says they believe in christ, that's a very specific belief which would demand specific reasons. Some say that they simply believe in some kind of higher power and that it's their personal faith. that's too easy isn't it? It's a cop-out. I evaluate people on an individual basis but my point is that someone shouldn't be given more respect for altering and compromising their already irrational faith to attempt to make it reasonable and more accepted by society. That to me is less honest. I think it's very indicative of the nature of religious faith.

dreams about office sex with pam, probably

I've missed mostof the season so far, I wonder if I can download any

a nuke was dropped in toronto ;) everything went super bright and then the wave knocked everything down. I was a distance whereby I couldn't tell whether I would die or live due to radiaton

the breakfast club