Jump to content

ecnarf

NF Fanatics
  • Posts

    11,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ecnarf

  1. I just think you're covering your ass.
  2. Sigh. Silver. No sunroof. Cloth upholstery. However, a 3.5 litre Northstar based V6 engine = ZOOM.
  3. A 2001 Oldsmobile Intrigue. A lot cooler than it sounds.
  4. Chemical engineer: one who does for profit what a chemist does for fun.
  5. Sounds like a plan. It rains enough in Vancouver to do some proper rallying.
  6. I don't suppose you could do some mad off-roading with that thing...
  7. ...and in general.
  8. ...Vancouver is fucked up.
  9. My front seat not only reclines but slides back so you have a good five feet of legroom.
  10. The hookers around here all look like men. Ouch.
  11. Dude, sarcasm. Ever heard of it?
  12. Why are you crying?
  13. How much do they recline? P.S. Hooker's body. Details. Don't forget you need a good gallon or two of gasoline for proper disposal.
  14. I can neither confirm nor deny ever remembering that.
  15. I'm surprised you didn't get it. Ultimate does not equal driving friends around, ultimate equals having a place to bang some chick. P.S. Is the trunk big enough for a hooker's body?
  16. It's some kind of cheese. Duh.
  17. Harper proposes fixed erections.
  18. on promoting to
  19. I still think the ultimate car needs a back seat.
  20. seeing jello biafra talk And I was fishing with scooby doo.
  21. Heh? I assume that this just means the bill would fail and the government would simply carry on with its business.
  22. blisters and crack
  23. Uh... huh... What were you doing in Toronto at midnight not in my bed?
  24. On its own it's a decent looking building, but in context, I'm going to go with what everyone else has said about it. One of my favourite buildings: U of T Faculty of Pharmacy building. Hopefully I'll be there in two years. http://www.greatspaces.utoronto.ca/projects/pharmacy.htm
  25. Let me get this straight... Not following the rules that say "Don't torture" doesn't mean we're going to torture? Then what, exactly, does it mean? We're not going to follow the rules but we're not going to break them anyways? I have a hard time believing that. We either are following international law or we are not. They wouldn't say that they aren't going to follow the Geneva convention if they weren't going to take advantage of the fact.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.