frustrated inc.

Chris Farley Kids in the Hall > SNL

*huggles*

http://www.nearfantastica.com/bored/index....ic=4343&hl=tabs http://www.nearfantastica.com/bored/index....pic=180&hl=tabs http://www.nearfantastica.com/bored/index....ic=3258&hl=tabs http://www.nearfantastica.com/bored/index....ic=2981&hl=tabs http://www.nearfantastica.com/bored/index....ic=1766&hl=tabs http://www.nearfantastica.com/bored/index....ic=2374&hl=tabs

That's not interesting at all.

(courtesy of Maddox)

;)

I disagree with that entirely. Say I took a batch of MP3s, an album I was working on, and stuffed them in a directory, then sent that link to five friends asking them to check them out. Would I expect those files to be "public", just because they were on the internet? If I didn't tell anyone else, why would I need to password protect the directory? And doing a "blog by email" isn't the same thing. That's pretty much requiring people to read your writing and look at your pictures, rather than simply giving them the option. Private blog = Friends-only LiveJournal. I can't see much of a difference here, save that there isn't any obvious way (that I'm aware of, though I'm an MT user) to password protect a Blogger blog. We can't assume he intended to eventually make the thing public. It became "public" for reasons that weren't intentional, even if (I assume) he knew about them. The internet is public. You password-protect something on the internet for the same reason you have a PIN number on your debit card.

Thats bullshit. If that was true, he would just send emails, rather than put it on the web. For honda, before he modified his post.

I do know how to.

DOES IT HAVE SWEET RIMS AND SOOPED-UP EXHAUST??!?

I'd have to assume Matt Good would be deciding who has access and who doesn't. On a website, you can set up specific directories to be password protected. If only a dozen or so people are going to have access to something, then this is a good way to go. Everyone can have their own account, and if they share their account with someone who abuses the site, the individual account can easily be removed. If it's something that more people are going to have access to, then the best idea would be message board format, but have some sort of sysop or mod validation, rather than just email verification.

The most secure thing he could do is provide those people invited to see his blog with unique usernames and passwords. Any account that abuses the blog could easily be removed. Not sure how feasable this would be though.

Can someone who's 17 legally even own a car?

Password protecting it or making the URL have some random characters. Either would be just as effective.

Oh, the drama. His blog is back up, and is supposed to be invite only. But there isn't anything stopping anyone from seeing the blog, if they know the URL. Saladbowl's statement holds true.

Where did you hear Mike Rowe made lots of money? Microsoft paid for the out-of-pocket expenses to transfer his site elsewhere, and gave Mike an Xbox.

I don't help ESL.

I turn the keyboard over to my mentally retarded 7-year old brother, who will explain this to you. hE sAiD thAt bECauSe matT waS bEinG a cOcKSuCkEr. plEasE StOp aSKinG stOoPid QUesTiOns. yOu GiVE Us RETaRds a BaD naMe. tHanK yOu. Okay, Im back now. Anyway, if Matt didn't want to talk to Scot, he could have hung up the phone, much in the same manner you would hang up the phone if a telemarketer called you. Not telling the person to go fuck themself, not telling them to suffocate themselves by sticking their head in their butt. Just say "No thanks" and hang up the phone. Simple, but highly effective.

Did you not read what was said before that?

If I were a celebrity and didn't want people I didn't know calling me, I sure as shit wouldn't be posting my home phone number on the internet. If the dialogue is accurate, Scot did nothing wrong.

CNN is covering the story right now. It's absolutly ridiculous this thread has so many views in such little time. OMG MATT HAD A MESSAGE BOARD AND NOW HE DOES NOT WHAT IS GOING ON PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME!!1 Clearly he had his reasons for taking it down, and no amount of speculation or hear-say will change a single thing.

Prediction: Within 20 years the US will bomb the shit out of a neighbouring planet, and will implement a 5-year plan to rebuild said planet. The 5-year plan will take 10 years, but by the time it's all said and done, the US will have relocated their entire country to that planet, under the Inter-Global Patriotic and Unity Liberation Act. Unconfirmed reports of purple yurbles digging tunnels under the soil to steal and eat human babies will be made, and a war on yurbles will be declared on or about 2038. The surrounding uninhabited territories will be invaded and annexed by the US, this forming the super power, the Allied Enfranchisements of the United States of Planet Freedom. In the meantime, the former United States of America would be farmed and used to feed the hungry in third world countries, as part of a global group effort. World peace and utopia would soon follow on Earth. But at this point, the Allied Enfranchisements of the United States of Planet Freedom would have a complete monopoly of all the territory on Planet Freedom. The terror threat level will be brought down to code blue, and the Allied Enfranchisements of the United States of Planet Freedom will be declared as the winning country of life, but no one will really care.

mumsy sounds way too pansy-ish. so i'd stay away from that, unless that's the image you want, of course. and since this isn't actually a band, but just you, do you really need a "band" name?

Orginally I was going to just quote the first few sentences and say "WTF", and state that this is a great example of opinion being presented as fact. But it looks like a few people have picked up on that, so no further comment is needed. In fact, dont read this post.