matrix

No, you're right on that point. My point is that I find his reviews are not based on plot, story, pacing, acting, direction and etc, etc. I find his reviews to be more fan based oriented, like a little kid watching a movie. They could care less about story, as long as it's a cool movie. Also, can you really say Episode I or II are better than any of the LoTR's?

War of the Worlds

Well, you're one lucky biatch.

Return to Blue Lagoon

Are you sure, RoTK won best picture, but I believe the other two were nominated.

Lord of Illusion

I'm a fanboy too, but Episode 1 and 2 were such a bust, I just don't want to be disappointed again. And just so every knows how bad of a reviewer I think Joblo is. Check this: Attack of the Clones (8/10) – The Empire Strikes Back (9/10) – Fellowship of the Ring (7/10) – The Phantom Menace (8/10) – The Two Towers (5/10) - Return of the King (6/10) He rated both The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones higher then any of the Lord of the Rings? What??? I seem to remember all three Rings nominated for best picture. Huh, that's weird.

The Last of the Dogmen

Alright, my first points didn't fare so well, because I had nothing to back it up. Let me try and make it more clear. In Canadian law, a baby is not considered a person until it is born. Now, many of you have stated the fact you believe it is alright for abortion because the fetus has no opinion one way or the other. It has no ability to comprehend life and death. Ok, that's fine. Now, tell me, at what point would a child begin to comprehend that? Three, four years old? Maybe not even that young. So, if that's your arguement, would you say that it's alright to kill a child who's two years old and hasn't developed enough to comprehend death? That's what it sounds like to me. My point is that if you're going to say that a fetus is not human because it can't think or comprehend, then a child wouldn't be human until it can think for itself, comprehend life and death, incorporate it's own decisions and opinions. Killing is killing, whether it's done to a fetus who's two months along, or to a child a year old. That's just my opinion. I think abortion at anytime is wrong.

I find Joblo's reviews unreliable. He gave Tombraider an 8/10. That's crap.

I'm sorry, your avatar.

What do you mean how do I know a fetus, who's brain is not yet developed, has had no exposure to any emotional stimuli, and has no ability to comphrehend or make critical judgements, has no opinion as to whether or not it's alive? I'd say it's a damn good guess. It's brain structure suggests otherwise. It does actually, yeah. First: You're guess is just a guess. To assume a fetus cannot form an opinion on whether or not it's alive or not is ridiculous. The brain starts to develop at eight weeks. I believe that at that instant the fetus would feel the sensation of life. Since there is no way of scientifically proving this, I cannot guarentee one way or the other. My point being, is that a living organism would rather be alive than dead. And by killing someone before they have the oppurtunity to give their opinion is considered murder. You're right, maybe the fetus doesn't have the ability to make that decision, but you're taking away the oppurtunity to give their opinion later on. Second: A dog bleeds and can get hurt. If you've ever had a dog, or any pet for that matter, you can tell when it gets hurt, they'll yelp or cry. Based on that, you know it can feel pain. I'll make a guess on this one. Would the animal rather feel pain or not. I'm guessing not. Would it rather be dead or alive. I'm guessing alive. Third: dead [ ded ] adjective (comparative dead·er, superlative dead·est) 1. no longer alive: having passed from the living state to being no longer alive EX. a dead bird 2. inanimate: never having been alive and having none of the characteristics of a living thing Brain-dead adjective 1. medicine with nonfunctioning brain: lacking functions of the brain and central nervous system as measured by brainwave activity on an electroencephalogram over a set period of time Braindead doesn't state anywhere that the patient is dead (within the compounds of the definition stated above).

How do you know a fetus doesn't have an opinion? Hell, a dog could have an opinion. We don't know, and there's no scientific proof that either don't have opinions. As far as the 'veggie', just because a person is braindead, does not mean they're dead. You could argue for all intensive purposes that they are, but they're heart is still beating, which means they're still alive.

Ok, let's compare a fetus and someone in so much pain, who is already dying, but mental cannot make that decision. We've all seen the news, like that one lady a couple months ago. I can't remember her name. She could make an opinion on that, and even if she could, no one would know. Would killing her be considered murder? Or anyone in that situation? I would consider that murder, just as I do abortion.

Well, I'm speaking in technical terms. There are some people old enough to be my parents I don't consider human.

I'm sorry, but I believe Canadian law has it wrong. First: Encarta dictonary definintion of fetus: fe·tus [ ftəss ] (plural fe·tus·es) or foe·tus [ ftəss ] (plural foe·tus·es) noun unborn offspring: an unborn vertebrate at a stage when all the structural features of the adult are recognizable, especially an unborn human offspring after eight weeks of development So, after eight weeks the fetus is considered human. That is, it has developed far enough along where that it has structural features such as bones, muscles, etc. Therefore, based on this definition, Canadian law is wrong whereas it states that an unborn child is not consider human/person until it is born, and therefore has no rights. So, technically, an unborn child becomes a human/person eight weeks after conception.

BTW, your pic is broken.

Whoa, just finished read that shit. What's his fucking problem? That's like Bipolar shit. edit: By the way insober, if you did get that Since I was Your Man vid, could you post with a yousendit link?

Well, in murder or homicide cases I've caught eye of or heard on the news, if both the mother and unborn child die, then the suspect/accused is charged with double murder. That is of couse in the States, where there are abortion laws.

YSLOS = You silly load of shit?

Out of Luck

Last House on the Left

Does the store or even the bored support Matt? I mean, it's fan support, but it's not like he recieves royalities like he would on sold CDs.

Out of Sight

I don't know about Canada, but in California, there's a new law where mothers can take their unwanted baby or child to any hospital or police station and drop them off, no questions asked. It sounds kind of weird, but it creates a better option than abortion. If they decide they do not want the child, they can go to the hospital and then the hospital will find a home for the child.