Matt

I saw it on Much Music, it was fairly interesting to watch what happened and what not...

Some of their songs are all right. I saw them live though and I was not very impressed actually.

I like Ziggy Sigmund's new band, "UCHU", Ziggy Sigmund was one of the guitarists in "Econoline Crush".

I saw them live recently and got to meet the band. I have the E.P. as well and it's alright.

They just showed "Fromage 04", I had only seen bits of this one before, but I like "Fromage" generally and this one was pretty amusing too.

Bradford How was pretty annoying actually, Ed The Sock, and George Strombo have been the only ones that I have found to be not that annoying.

Actually I am right.

But Megan has only one e. If you are going to argue from a cover stand point then "The Salteens" albums "Short-Term Memories" and "Let Go Of Your Bad Days" both say Megan Bradfield, and the recently released "Sparrow" album, "The Early Years" also lists her name as Megan Bradfield. Did you ever think that maybe Matthew Good misspells her name on her blog and what not? Well it has two e's on her blog: http://meegee.blogspot.com/ and check LL's site. From the comments section of "Meegee Blog" for the post "man o man pt. 2". There was a little discussion about the spelling of her name in there...

But Megan has only one e. If you are going to argue from a cover stand point then "The Salteens" albums "Short-Term Memories" and "Let Go Of Your Bad Days" both say Megan Bradfield, and the recently released "Sparrow" album, "The Early Years" also lists her name as Megan Bradfield. Did you ever think that maybe Matthew Good misspells her name on her blog and what not?

that's her actual name, fuck-face p.s. sorry about the fuck-face thing, i'm just pissed off because my drummer is an ass-clown Her name is spelled Megan Bradfield, it is not spelled Meegan... Whoever wrote it like that made a mistake...

Has anyone noticed that they've misspelled Megan Bradfield's name in the artwork? They've spelled it as "Meegan Bradfield".

http://www.warchild.ca/audiovideo.asp I think so...

I think they're older than the 90s...

So "54-40"'s music, yeah...

I really like the new "54-40" CD with Dave Genn, they're still a lot like "The Tragically Hip"/"R.E.M." though...

So "Sum 41" was on "The Hour" today talking about their documentary they did for "War Child". It was done in the Congo after fighting was supposed to be done there in 2004. But on the fifth day, I think, their hotel came under attack... But from the clips it looked like it might be interesting, but I can't quite remember what the name of it is...

Some bills are too controversial so that they might not be passed in a proportional representation situation. But people generally vote for who they want now. Sure some may vote for one party to help block another party from getting a majority of seats, but that can happen in any democratic system anyways.

But not every bill that is passed is bad, some that are good, might not be passed every bit as much as some that are bad anyways, but at least there is a greater chance of having the good ones passed in the house of commons.

I read your blog post about it, Crusader, and the part about Canada's role being downplayed, I think if it was downplayed and was intentional then it was because the story is about Paul and what he did.

The system we're in works better because we can have bills passed more at a good pace. Why should some bills wait? No system is perfect but at least our system functions well, and at a good pace.

It's rather difficult to do that now because the ruling party would like to be re-elected so they have to be careful or else the public might turn against them.

I thought this was a pretty good movie... has anyone else seen it?

But the people who voted Liberal did not get a Liberal budget, so how is that compromise? It's a smaller party forcing a larger party into doing what they ask for their support.

We don't need proportional representation, little would be accomplished, and it would take longer to pass bills through the house of commons.

We do not need proportional representation, the current situation proves we cannot "get along" well enough to make it work because the same situation can occur under proportional representation because a coalition such as the ones currently made tend to happen in proportional representation. Also under proportional representation back room deals sometimes happen such as the one that happened between the Liberals and the N.D.P. I believe that the people who voted Liberal voted for the Liberal solution to the budget, yet what they got was the N.D.P. one, that's not the majority speaking at all.