+44

[daniel_v]

I posted this in the Angels and Airwaves discussion but I figured I'd give it its own thread.

 

+44

 

Hate it, like it, love it, discuss.

 

Edit: link has been fixed. (Thanks Ryan)

Edited September 4, 2006 by daniel_v

[Ryan44]

maybe its just me, but that site is wrong. that is like 1000 pages of computer junk or somethign

 

i also used explorer and it still doesnt work.

Edited September 4, 2006 by Ryan44

[Shiri]

What kind of a lame band name is that?!

[soundless_space]

Someone sent me an MP3 from them the other day... it's alright. Nothing new, but it's interesting to hear what they would have to offer after everything. It sort of seems like they're trying to make a comeback just as good or better than Angels and Airwaves or something.

[garsk]

What kind of a lame band name is that?!

well maybe there in this weird contest with Angels and Airwaves for the worst band name?

[Guest apsham]

It's the dialing code from where they first came up for the idea on the band, somewhere in England I believe.

[borntohula]

i hate to say it, but at least tom's shitass music doesnt still sound like blink 182.

 

i used to favor mark's voice, but now that i'm not 13, he just sounds like a weiner.

Edited September 4, 2006 by borntohula

[AnOceanPearl]

I don't mind it, but it's nothing special.

 

Pretty catchy though.

[Audio of Being]

eww pop punk