Jump to content
matrix

Question On History Teacher?

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could someone help me on this? What are the names of the two discs in History Teacher? Is it Broken and 15 Hours on a Sept. Thursday? Or Left of Normal?

Join or sign in to the forums to disable this ad!

Dookas27018
Posted

History Teacher is a title coined by some guy and not Matt, but I suppose it consists of 4 albums/demos, they are "15 Hours...", "Broken", "Left Of Normal", and "Euphony"

Posted

Exactally.

 

Those so called "History Teacher CDs" are NOT, and Ill repeat that, NOT authorized by Matt.

mrs.matthew.good
Posted

yes but matt does acknowledge them, he sued the guy over them and got the rights for the cd. (this is what he told me when i asked him to sign my copy) so technically it became his although he didn't authorize them to be made or sold.

 

cheers.

Posted

So, there's four discs in there? Where the hell did I hear two? Does anyone have copies of these discs? I heard that the idiot who sold them made 400. If anyone has a copy of these cd's could you please IM what order the songs are in?

Posted

No theres two cds, but four albums.

 

I will simplify it:

 

You buy four albums, right? And you say, wow, this is good music, but too many cds. So you put two albums together and burn them onto one cd, and put the other two onto one cd also.

 

History teacher guy deserves to have his balls put into a vice. And his head.

Posted

but without him we wouldn't have parable or heathers like sunday,....what would you do then?

Instant-Karma
Posted

History teacher rules, I thank the guy who put it all together. I'm more a fan of matts music then his musical rights...

Posted

I think the people who need their balls in a vice are the people who come on every week and start the same thread about History Teacher when there's another thread (or four) just like it that they could find if they just bothered to look.

Posted

Hey man, searching is difficult. Sorry.

Posted

OK people, I really don't think anyone is qualified to comment on this "History Teacher Guy" since we don't really know the story. From what I know, Matt owed the guy money and wouldn't pay him back. Creating the History Teacher CD's was just his way of getting the money back. I got this info first-hand from "History Teacher Guy" when he was selling the CD's.

 

Now, let's stop with the History Teacher stuff, yeesh! ;)

Posted

If that were true, i doubt MG would have won the suingness...

Posted

I really don't think it was a matter of Matt "winning" or "losing". It was a matter of, "Hey that dude is distributing my music without my permission, and I'm not getting any credit, so I'm gonna sue". The fact that Matt owed him money was a completely seperate issue. The way the guy should have dealt with it was to take him to small claims court, not illegally distribute Matt's music for his own profit...

Posted
I really don't think it was a matter of Matt "winning" or "losing". It was a matter of, "Hey that dude is distributing my music without my permission, and I'm not getting any credit, so I'm gonna sue". The fact that Matt owed him money was a completely seperate issue. The way the guy should have dealt with it was to take him to small claims court, not illegally distribute Matt's music for his own profit...

And that's the exact reason people rag on the history teacher guy.

Posted

Amen. Balls = viced.

 

I bet that would hurt.

Posted
I really don't think it was a matter of Matt "winning" or "losing".  It was a matter of, "Hey that dude is distributing my music without my permission, and I'm not getting any credit, so I'm gonna sue".  The fact that Matt owed him money was a completely seperate issue.  The way the guy should have dealt with it was to take him to small claims court, not illegally distribute Matt's music for his own profit...

And that's the exact reason people rag on the history teacher guy.

Exactly. I don't think he should have done it either, but I just wanted to point out that I don't think Matt would have won or lost based on the money he owed the dude. I think the suit must have been based more on the illegal distribution of the stuff. Yeah, so that's all ;)

mrs.matthew.good
Posted
I really don't think it was a matter of Matt "winning" or "losing". It was a matter of, "Hey that dude is distributing my music without my permission, and I'm not getting any credit, so I'm gonna sue". The fact that Matt owed him money was a completely seperate issue. The way the guy should have dealt with it was to take him to small claims court, not illegally distribute Matt's music for his own profit...

You got it bang on!!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.