Jump to content
rmak

Where Do U Stand

If an election is held today, who do vote for? (in this minority govt u never know)  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. If an election is held today, who do vote for? (in this minority govt u never know)

    • Paul Martin - Liberal
      21
    • Stephen Harper - Conservative
      7
    • Jack Layton - NDP
      26
    • Gilles Duceppe - BLOC
      2
    • Jim Harris - Green
      10
    • other
      4


Recommended Posts

Join or sign in to the forums to disable this ad!

Posted

Meh,I'd vote Liberal.......don't feel like explain why...... ;)

 

On a side note,I wonder if we'd end up with another minority government if the election was right now.....

Posted

Speculation a few weeks ago before the Liberal convention was that the Liberals might have called another election soon so that they could gain a majority gov't. those rumors turned out false of course.

 

The anger over the sponsership scandal & Dalton McGuinty has died down a bit so i think the Libs would likely get a majority.

Posted
If you want what the Conservatives are promising, vote Conservative. If you want what the Liberals are promising, vote NDP.

The N.D.P. would never likely fulfill their promises due to the fact that economically they could not work. Taxing the rich means that those taxes will get passed down to the people purchasing the goods and services. This could have a negative effect, such as a depression. If wage increases do not keep up with price increases people have less money to buy the goods, meaning layoffs happen, and as less and less money is available, more and more layoffs are made. The N.D.P. would also send us into more debt.

Posted

There's a huge difference between taxing the rich and taxing the richly owned buisness'

 

Taxing the rich= No problem

Taxing the rich-man's buisness= bad for buisness

Posted

But the rich man will put the money into the cost of the goods and services in his buisness because he wants to keep up his former amount of income.

Posted

Money has to be kept into the buisness at equal or greater value to maintain or increase the value of it. It's not that rare for him to increase the price...

Posted
The N.D.P. would never likely fulfill their promises due to the fact that economically they could not work. Taxing the rich means that those taxes will get passed down to the people purchasing the goods and services. This could have a negative effect, such as a depression. If wage increases do not keep up with price increases people have less money to buy the goods, meaning layoffs happen, and as less and less money is available, more and more layoffs are made. The N.D.P. would also send us into more debt.

the NDP would fulfill their promises. It doesn't matter if it wouldn't work economically, because they'd do it anyways and pile up more national debt. Just like Pierre Trudeau did.

 

NDP would kill our country economically. Yes its nice to help people, but you've also got to run a country like a business.

Posted

Contrary to popular belief, provincial NDP governments, on the whole, have a better record of fiscal conservatism (avoid deficit spending and pay down debt) than any other party. As for NDP promises not working, yeah, that must be why other countries have such better social programs and such smaller debt than us. Boing.

Posted

I was refferring to the federal N.D.P. But, the provincial N.D.P. spent money on programs that did not work, they were not fiscally conservative in the least.

Posted (edited)
But, the provincial N.D.P. spent money on programs that did not work, they were not fiscally conservative in the least.

 

This is false, sir.

 

The federal NDP doesn't have any type of record.

 

And what provincal NDP are we talking? BC?

 

I meant in general, across all provinces where they've been in power. But especially in BC, where, contrary to popular belief, they inherited a massive budget deficit from the SoCreds, reduced it over time and ran surpluses for their last few years, paid down some of BC's debt, and then lost the election in 2001 to the Liberals - who promptly ran the biggest deficit BC had seen in decades.

Edited by Bizud
Posted

i know it doesn't seem practical but i think my beliefs reside with NDP...i need lower tuition!! it's a fine line though i did all those political spectrum tests i'm some sort of left-wing socialist or something like that.

 

but you know what's funny? the more extreme you get..you start coming back around the other side. maybe i'm twisted but i think after a while communism starts sounding like capitalism.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.