HSteele

Pitchfork Fucking raped this album. It was a hilarious review.

I would for one. That shit is a collector's item. It's comments like that the make me really consider selling mine.

How do you get that out of what I said. I did not mention specific re-issued albums, all I said was bands with less talent and commercial appeal have to offer more incentives for people to actual buy them as opposed to talented, popular bands can add a few tracks to a great album and watch sales rise. Anyone who spends $50 on this Weezer disk is a fucking moron. Then again, anyone who spends any money on Pavement is just as stupid.

I think he was trying to point out that whoever credited that song as Matthew Good made a mistake which would make you as much of a "tool" as the other guy. Oh the irony, indeed.

Isn't amazing that people are proud to be near others on that chart. It is almost as if you have the same political ideals or something.

The worse the band is the more shit they have to throw into the deal to get people to buy it. It is that simple.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.33 So Center/Libertarian it is. I feel outnumbered by you damn anarchists and socialists.

Either way, I live in Texas and I've known of the Arcade Fire for at least a year or so. If you have the chance to check them out do it.

They are terrible. Their cover of Comfortably Numb is sheer blasphamy.

I own all the dvd's but it is definitely hit or miss. But when it hits it really hits.

What about the alternate version of Born to Kill? Did you put that one on your burnt cd as well?

No, give it up.

and its official, your opinion doesn't count. Mrs. Jesus: the money was for the shot

Yeah, it was pretty funny. It was right after I took a shot of tabasco sauce. Easiest ten bucks I've ever made.

terrible movie, seriously. You must have voted for Black Sheep if you liked Little Nicky. EDIT: and my boss did slap me in the face and call me a retard the other day, so if that tells you something.

You have got to be joking me. Americans may be egotistical, but anyone with intellegence, as a historian should be, would never make such an absurd statement. Wars begin with an official declaration and end with an official treaty. It is the way organized bodies determine the difference between, war, rebellion, and terrorism. For example, in the American Revolution, the battles of Lexington and Concord were viewed as acts of rebellion because they occured in 1775, as were all other battles until they declared war as a soveriegn body in 1776.

You guys are retadred. First off, Black Sheep is terrible. Second, Rob Lowe was in Tommy Boy, not Black Sheep Third, Little Nicky is probbaly the worst Adam Sandler movie, and that says a lot. Finally, David Spade was easily the second fiddle to Farley. He doesn't have the charisma to stand alone as a comedic lead. Joe Dirt was funny but thats about it. He'll always be known as Farley's sidekick.

The harsh treaty did not the main cause of WWII, it was one of a numerous amount of factors and most historians agree that the war could have been avoided inspite of the Treaty of Versailles. And by your definition, Poles will tell you that WWII ended in 1939.

Well I like to wait until an event ends before I declare it "over". Perhaps thats just me. And what does the fact that it was "diasterous" have to do with anything.

Are you telling me that the Treaty of Versailles wasn't officailly signed on June 28, 1919?

I believe that in order for a war to be decided a treaty must be signed. The Treaty of Versailles was drafted and signed in May and June of 1919. Nice try guys.

Mine is 01919 which is also the year that WWI ended. Coincidence? I think not.

;) :angry: :angry: :angry:

So wait, if you don't like Matt Good or, specifically, his last album then you therefore don't understand the music industry? Whereas, those who like his newer stuff have a better understanding? I don't understand your logic whatsoever.

Actually, he blew out his knee in college and could never get back into shape to go pro. It is not as if he didn't have the ability. And id acting has never been that bad. I'm no wrestling fan but how is the Rock worse than Stalone/Van Damme/Segal/Schwarzenegger?