ecnarf

I agree, Lauren, the first Harry Potter movie was just plain bad. I saw the second one and thought it was a minor improvement in directing. I can't say much for the acting, but the directing in the first two movies was just plain awful. It was like a kid's movie trying to carry a someone adult (I use that term loosely) storyline. EDIT: OMG harry looks fit.

But Moonlight, that would be bad for the economy!

Sssh, they're not going to close it. The last store closure had NOTHING to do with unions. Where'd you get the crazy idea that wal-mart doesn't like unions? It's all crazy! Crazy, I tell you!

I declare the subway station to strongly resemble Kennedy Station.

When are you going to learn? You're an idiot. Proportional representation means that the representation in the House of Commons EQUALS the number of votes they got nationwide. Right now, the representation in the house of commons DOES NOT EQUAL the number of votes parties got nationwide.

Unless I've got my definitions mixed up, a confederation is a weak association of strong states, and a federation is a strong association of weak states. For example, Russia is a federation, but the United States (at its birth, at any rate) was a confederation. So I'm just a little bit confused at calling Canada a federation, even though we "confederated" in 1867. Hmm. I'm also not sure that proportional representation will end Ontario's dominance. It would end the liberal's dominance, for sure, but since Ontario still has a huge population compared to the rest of the country, the population of Ontario would make up a considerable amount of the representation in the House of Commons. Although since it would break up the way in which one party manages to gain a large amount of the seats without a large amount of the popular vote (as the liberals often do in Ontario), it would definitely lessen the gain of the goldmine that are Ontario ridings.

Oh, what will we proles without a cell phone do to get our matthew good kicks?

Why are Canadian politics dominated by Ontario? We have the largest population. And, truth be told, we are actually underrepresented in the House of Commons on a per capita basis.

You caker.

Having read the truth of the matter, do you still hold to your short-sighted opinion?

George W. Would you like a porn forum?

I want cake.

My favourite show isn't on there. Most of those shows suck, or I've never seen them.

I love landoverbaptist.

Limblifter - Bullring

God didn't create me. My birth can be explained through simple biology.

I'd do her.

The bible also says that those who don't keep the sabbath holy must be put to death. Well, yesterday, which was Saturday, I went in to Habitat for Humanity and helped build a couple houses. That's right, I worked on and desecrated the Sabbath. I suppose your only option is to stone me.

I'm having trouble keeping track of your logic: -the reason for not being gay was actually so the whole population wouldn't collapse -the reason for having kids was so they could have boys so they could have help on the farm -selling your daughters as slaves wasn't biblical but selling your daughter as a slave is permitted in leviticus, which is the same book as the condemning of homosexuality. I don't get it.

But getting a girl means that you'd be able to sell her as a slave according to Leviticus.

Yeah, that has to be the best argument against people being gay. If everyone did it, the population would collapse! Wake up and smell the reality - NOT EVERYONE IS GAY, and there will never be a time when everyone will be gay. And don't even try to apologize for the babble's bigotry by saying that it is trying to safeguard society against total population collapse.

Your mother. Have you met his mother?

Saturnine always wins.

Sex. What isn't the meaning of life?

Nope. Do you watch the Daily Show?