RicardoObviouso

the opening scene was fantastic (butterflies attacking & falling out the window). i had never heard of the show. when the old dude said "i wish i had a lab", and the chick said "you do", i immediately lost interested and turned it off. tv sucks, these days.

only at work. i cant wait til this laptop bites it. i'm so tempted to dive into this big sale on friday.

just take it back and dont sweat it. what would suck is if they made you exchange it for a new one. you're not really conning them anyways... futureshop will get a credit for it from the manufacturer.

my mac is 20". it's got 4gb of ram, 250gb hard drive, core 2 duo processor (2.66 i think) and a video card that i'll never use. plus it looks good.

do the swap. i wouldn't.

i think it was around 1800 after taxes, so it must have been $1599.

being able to differentiate between an ugly man and a good looking man, or even deciding who's better looking between two good looking guys does not make someone gay. if anything, it makes them more in-tune with and confident in their sexuality. welcome to the twenty-first century, fags.

charles, you can build arguments for and against anything, but whats the point? especially if it's based solely on speculation? anyone who takes the time time to write a book and get it published is going to credit sources. a publisher wouldn't be doing their job if the story went uncredited.

exactly. bishop: first and foremost, you have no idea if the author has credible sources. an author can sift through hundreds of interviews and speak to those who know or have worked with matt personally and build a true story about him without ever meeting or talking to him. again, see "inside steve's brain". the rest of your argument is based on speculation, so this is where i'll stop. think 'true hollywood story'. most of those shows are produced, written and aired without permission from the subject. they very rarely contain actual interviews from the subject regarding the story, but they do have a lot of stock information and interviews from obscure people who encountered the subject throughout the subject's life (producers, acting coaches, high school teachers, friends, etc). only when the production steps out of bounds does the subject get involved. i cant sit here and promise you that matt is ok with it, because he probably isn't... but to say that the author is going to get his ass sued is just as ludicrious as assuming that matt should have his shoes full of piss or whatever you were trying to say.

re: the book anyone can write anything about anyone at any time, so long as: it doesn't come off as libelous, the author clearly disclaims that: a. the information can be verified by credible resources and b. the piece wasn't authorized or approved by the subject in question 'inside steve's brain' is standing proof, for those of you who may disagree.

what do you call an nf member with no arms and no legs? phoenix9797 hahahahahahahahha.

...maybe. everyone's got a full roster on saturday. opportunities for over 200 points in a night.

you keep saying that, yet as of today you're 240 points behind third place.

i dont have time for it to make my night... someone give me the cole's

yeah, those drugs must have been good.

perfection isn't something i'd ever wish on anyone, and anyone who claims to be perfect is someone i feel sorry for.

well her working there isn't the ironic part. the fact that she asked for a raise, cried broke then seemingly donated money to the church IS. even still, i wouldn't call it irony... maybe contradictory.

so what you're saying is that i'm right.

i don't think that's irony.

instead of making a taxable donation, i would have intentionally misspelled her name on the ticket. much more fun.

beautiful. who wants to lay the ban hammer down?.... anton?

i'll let lauren explain

probably because masturbating while re-reading your posts aloud to yourself is part of your daily routine.

you can do better.

cl.org makes it happen