Jump to content

Crusader

NF Site Admin
  • Posts

    20,687
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by Crusader

  1. miley cyrus is boring and annoying on so many levels.
  2. I'm sure he'll avoid Winnipeg now if he reads your post history ;) But yeah, why wouldn't he go to Winnipeg? He always goes.
  3. Cleaned up this thread. Hope you can get your vinyl!
  4. Thanks, grabbed it.
  5. limit the number of connections too.
  6. yes.
  7. they show that all the time on the rerun movie channel.
  8. i played some wow on a private server. jesus this is a timesink. time to quit lol
  9. Try that: http://ircalc.usps.gov/
  10. Oh god. Lazy town. That reminds me of this: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1912846
  11. i love hello time bomb [part 2]
  12. buy a pc lol. have you tried logging in as root? su -
  13. oooh nice. i'll try and buy us a vinyl or something so we can give it away on the site or something.
  14. get auf der stage!
  15. I've got about 5,000 integers that need to be checked if a user has seen before. These integers are grouped into different categories of varying size, so one category could contain 325 of the integers while another has 50 of them. They're all unique integers and won't appear in any category more than once. Meaning that if it's in one category, it's only in that category. Right now I have a table setup to contain the following: user_id | category_1 | category_2 | category_3 | category_n... etc In category_1 there's just a comma separated list of integers that the user has seen before. eg. 1,2,3,5,6,7,111,9,10 This seems a bit clunky so I'm thinking about storing each individual integer seen in its own row. Kind of like this. user_id | int_seen | category The only problem I can think of is that there could be any number of user_ids... It'd probably be capped at 10,000 but that'd still be 50,000,000 entries in the table... My solution to that would be clearing the table of a specific user_id's entries when they have seen all the integers and making another table that contains a list of users that have done this. That and maybe having a group_id column in the original table so people in a group can share a result set instead. What do you guys think? Any ideas or alternatives? edit: hope that made sense
  16. bears have no soul
  17. k. i see your ds emulator, are you playing some pokemon? lol. also i have bioshock and system shock installed too. homeworld 2 is also awesome. what kind of rig you have setup? also i shoulda posted this in the games thread.
  18. do you frequent the somethingawful games forum?
  19. Those were waaaay too tiny to really see and now it's been deleted lol.
  20. http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/07/...el-harry-music/ IT'S TIME TO LEARN ABOUT ASTRONOMY
  21. This is the best game ever. http://www.e4.com/game/steamshovel-harry/play.e4
  22. Cool. Wiki usernames will likely be the ones used on the forums. I'll hopefully have something setup by the end of this semester.
  23. Canada finds vaccine for HIV, unplanned pregnancies increase 300%.
  24. depending on how much time i have free, i may install a wiki on the site but it'll probably have to be manually approved user registrations at first. anyone interested?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.